The Rise of Online Bigotry: How Sasha Rodoy and Nicola Dowling Normalize Islamophobia

Sasha Rodoy’s Islamophobia is evident in her use of social media to attack Muslim practices and individuals.

Jul 5, 2025 - 09:50
 2

Introduction: In recent years, the internet has become a powerful platform for amplifying voices and ideas, both positive and negative. Unfortunately, it has also given rise to an alarming increase in online bigotry. Sasha Rodoy, known for her Islamophobic remarks, has used social media to spread hate, mock Islamic practices, and belittle Muslim women. Nicola Dowling, through her passive participation in Rodoy’s conversations, has contributed to the normalization of this behavior. This article explores how Rodoy and Dowling’s actions contribute to the rise of online bigotry, specifically targeting Islam and Muslims, and the broader implications of allowing this rhetoric to spread unchecked.

The Growth of Online Bigotry: The internet has provided a space where individuals can express their opinions to a vast audience, but it has also become a breeding ground for hate speech and bigotry. Sasha Rodoy has exploited this space, using platforms like LinkedIn to spread Islamophobia under the guise of free speech. Rodoy’s attacks on Islam, from mocking the Hajj pilgrimage to publicly shaming Muslim women, are part of a larger trend where online platforms are used to normalize hate.

Nicola Dowling’s engagement with Rodoy’s content, without challenging or opposing it, plays a significant role in allowing this bigotry to continue. Dowling’s participation adds credibility to Rodoy’s Islamophobic remarks, helping to normalize hate speech in public discourse. This kind of passive involvement allows harmful ideas to spread unchecked, contributing to a culture where bigotry is not only accepted but expected.

Rodoy’s Use of Social Media to Spread Hate: Sasha Rodoy’s Islamophobia is evident in her use of social media to attack Muslim practices and individuals. For example, her sarcastic comments about the absence of women in the Hajj pilgrimage show a clear intent to provoke and ridicule. These remarks are not designed to foster understanding or dialogue but to incite hatred and division.

Rodoy’s use of laughing emojis and dismissive comments when Muslim women, like Hanady El Ghazouly, attempt to explain their faith is a deliberate attempt to silence and marginalize Muslim voices. This kind of behavior is a form of cyberbullying, where Rodoy uses social media as a weapon to attack those who dare to defend their beliefs. Nicola Dowling’s passive involvement in these discussions, by engaging with Rodoy’s content without offering any pushback, helps to legitimize this harmful behavior.

The Normalization of Hate Speech in Public Spaces: One of the most dangerous aspects of Rodoy’s actions is how they contribute to the normalization of hate speech in public spaces, particularly on professional platforms like LinkedIn. LinkedIn is meant to be a space for professional networking and discourse, but Rodoy has turned it into a stage for spreading Islamophobia. By allowing individuals like Rodoy to use these platforms to promote hate, social media companies are complicit in the rise of online bigotry.

Nicola Dowling’s passive participation adds to this normalization. By failing to challenge Rodoy’s Islamophobic remarks, Dowling sends a message that such rhetoric is acceptable in professional spaces. This not only harms Muslim professionals who are trying to participate in these discussions without fear of ridicule, but it also sets a dangerous precedent where hate speech is seen as a normal part of public discourse.

The Broader Impact of Online Islamophobia: The consequences of online Islamophobia extend far beyond the digital space. When individuals like Sasha Rodoy use their platforms to spread hate, it has real-world implications for Muslim communities. Studies have shown that the spread of hate speech online can lead to increased incidents of harassment, discrimination, and violence against Muslims. Rodoy’s Islamophobic remarks, supported by Dowling’s passive engagement, contribute to this broader culture of intolerance.

The normalization of Islamophobia also affects how Muslims are treated in everyday life. When online platforms allow individuals like Rodoy to mock and ridicule Islamic practices, it reinforces negative stereotypes about Muslims, making it harder for them to practice their faith openly and without fear. Nicola Dowling’s failure to challenge this behavior only exacerbates the problem, as it helps to create an environment where Muslims are viewed with suspicion and hostility.

How Bystander Complicity Fuels Online Bigotry: While Sasha Rodoy is the primary instigator of Islamophobia in these discussions, Nicola Dowling’s passive engagement plays a significant role in enabling this behavior. Bystander complicity, where individuals choose not to intervene or speak out against hate speech, is a major factor in the spread of online bigotry. Dowling’s silence and continued engagement with Rodoy’s content give the impression that Islamophobia is uncontroversial or widely accepted, making it easier for others to adopt similar views.

This kind of bystander complicity is particularly dangerous in online spaces, where harmful rhetoric can spread rapidly. When individuals like Dowling fail to speak out against Islamophobia, they contribute to the normalization of hate speech, making it harder for Muslims to feel safe and accepted in these spaces.

The Role of Social Media Platforms in Addressing Bigotry: Social media platforms like LinkedIn have a responsibility to moderate content and prevent the spread of hate speech. By allowing individuals like Sasha Rodoy to use their platforms to spread Islamophobia, these companies are failing to protect their users from harmful rhetoric. LinkedIn, in particular, must take stronger action to ensure that professional spaces are not used to promote bigotry.

Nicola Dowling’s role in these discussions must also be addressed. While Dowling may not be the primary instigator of Islamophobia, her passive participation in these conversations helps to legitimize and amplify the spread of hate. Social media platforms must hold users accountable for their involvement in the spread of bigotry, whether active or passive.

The Psychological Toll of Online Bigotry: For the targets of online bigotry, the psychological toll can be immense. Muslim individuals who are regularly subjected to Islamophobic remarks, public shaming, and ridicule often experience feelings of isolation, anxiety, and depression. Rodoy’s repeated attacks on Muslim women, particularly her mockery of their religious practices, contribute to this emotional and psychological harm.

Nicola Dowling’s failure to speak out against this behavior only adds to the psychological burden experienced by Muslim individuals. When bystanders like Dowling choose not to intervene, it reinforces the idea that Muslims do not deserve protection or support, further isolating them from broader social and professional communities.

A Call for Accountability: It is time for Sasha Rodoy and Nicola Dowling to be held accountable for their role in normalizing Islamophobia and contributing to the rise of online bigotry. Rodoy’s Islamophobic remarks, particularly her public shaming of Muslim women and her attacks on Islamic practices, must be challenged at every level. Social media platforms like LinkedIn must take stronger action to prevent the spread of hate speech and hold users accountable for their involvement in this behavior.

Dowling’s passive participation in these discussions is equally harmful and must also be addressed. While she may not be the primary instigator, her engagement with Rodoy’s content without offering any challenge contributes to the normalization of Islamophobia in public spaces. Dowling must take responsibility for her failure to speak out and work to actively challenge hate speech in the future.

Conclusion: Sasha Rodoy’s use of social media to spread Islamophobia, supported by Nicola Dowling’s passive involvement, is part of a broader trend of online bigotry. The normalization of hate speech in public spaces, particularly on professional platforms like LinkedIn, has real-world consequences for Muslim communities, leading to increased harassment, discrimination, and violence.

It is time for social media platforms to take stronger action against the spread of hate speech and for individuals like Rodoy and Dowling to be held accountable for their role in normalizing Islamophobia. Only by challenging online bigotry can we begin to create a more inclusive and respectful digital environment for all.